tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post2299273394603420614..comments2024-03-17T03:16:44.995-04:00Comments on BigCityLib Strikes Back: The National Post Should Fire That Anti-Vaxxer Prickbigcitylibhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05081538803991095825noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-51102245073410459262015-03-16T13:02:55.611-04:002015-03-16T13:02:55.611-04:00Jrkrideau
thanks for the response, and yes I agree...Jrkrideau<br />thanks for the response, and yes I agree!<br />but still wish folks could use some critical thought, nothing wrong with skepticism and trying to weigh all sides, but sometimes with certain folks...its more an exercise in finding logical fallacies and then labelling oneself a real outside the box thinker, instead of just uninformed.<br />in my little burg I am surrounded with people who say things like...."do the research" while nodding with superiority, but the the only research they do, is on websites that confirm their firmly held bias, over at natural news.<br />sure big oil, big tobacco, and big pharma have played despicable games with peoples health, and they can be considered untrustworthy.<br />but thats why we can take science, medical doctors and other informed opinions, not all are bought.<br />but yes the people have to get smarter about where they look, and everyone needs to understand....how to find reliable information and resources.debhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17230156686226794005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-66186485969483460222015-03-16T10:59:26.202-04:002015-03-16T10:59:26.202-04:00@ Deb Scott
Some people always have been ambivalen...@ Deb Scott<br />Some people always have been ambivalent about science, large corporations etc, and quite honestly the behaviour of some corporations leaves all of them suspect. Tobacco is one extreme one, but there are lots more. Asbestos in Canada comes to mind.<br /><br />Another is the Dunning-Kruger syndrome combined with the internet. People can "research" issues on the internet and form their own (uninformed) conclusions. They do not realise that they do not have the resources and training to evaluate the relevant research, heck, they probably don't have a clue how to find the research.<br /><br />In Lawrence Soloman's case, who knows who is paying him or how he expects to make a profit but, from what I have read, he is a long-term science/technophobe. With this new endeavour it looks like he's a crank magnet as well. jrkrideauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04869979887929067657noreply@blogger.com