tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post7383685441398234722..comments2024-03-17T03:16:44.995-04:00Comments on BigCityLib Strikes Back: Tories Use Porn Star In Youth Advertisingbigcitylibhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05081538803991095825noreply@blogger.comBlogger68125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-28434391301424653452008-02-24T15:29:00.000-05:002008-02-24T15:29:00.000-05:00He's been here lots of times, BCL (and not just as...He's been here lots of times, BCL (and not just as a sock-puppet). Do you ever check profiles?Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-67108480564604196212008-02-24T14:48:00.000-05:002008-02-24T14:48:00.000-05:00Wow. Thanks for the link TG. That is just disturbi...Wow. Thanks for the link TG. That is just disturbing.<BR/><BR/>Some people make their points with intelligent commentary. I guess the ones who cannot do that have to resort to psycho behaviour.<BR/><BR/>It is sad.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-81241191265537030282008-02-24T14:31:00.000-05:002008-02-24T14:31:00.000-05:00...and yet the sock-puppet claims still go without...<I>...and yet the sock-puppet claims still go without proof...</I><BR/><BR/>You admitted <A HREF="http://moronality.blogspot.com/2007/06/focus-on.html" REL="nofollow">here</A> that you sock-puppeted:<BR/><BR/>"Blogger Richard said...<BR/><BR/>Ok, let me get this straight... You're giving me the gears because I used a pseudonym directly attached to a domain that I legally own..."<BR/><BR/>...although I'm sure you'll rationalise it as something else, because you're too mentally-ill/alcohol-addled to be in touch with common sense anymore.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-22110048292906268622008-02-24T14:25:00.000-05:002008-02-24T14:25:00.000-05:00richard - are you suggesting I accused YOU of bein...richard - are you suggesting I accused YOU of being a sock puppet? Because I haven't.<BR/><BR/>I suspect you may be, but I do not accuse you because, as you say, I have no proof.<BR/><BR/>I do wonder if you think you have anything useful to add on the actual subject of this post? It seems to me you are devoted to the idea of bashing people without offering anything of substance. That says a lot about you. It is also the kind of behaviour one sees from sock puppets.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-14192258279612654772008-02-24T13:44:00.000-05:002008-02-24T13:44:00.000-05:00...and yet the sock-puppet claims still go without......and yet the sock-puppet claims still go without proof...<BR/><BR/>You know, we expect thai-guy to lie. It's what he does. I thought gayle would be smarter than that though...Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08833076599650152590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-45332682788238233582008-02-24T13:22:00.000-05:002008-02-24T13:22:00.000-05:00porn or no porn, this is one of the CONs dumbest a...porn or no porn, this is one of the CONs dumbest and most insulting ads so far. Don't join them for what you believe, or for what they represent, join them to piss off your ex.<BR/><BR/>After all, women don't understand politics, so what other reason would they have for joining a party?900ft Jesushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01882830831096870992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-73281301768121462552008-02-24T10:18:00.000-05:002008-02-24T10:18:00.000-05:00richard - again, I am not sure why you are so obse...<I>richard - again, I am not sure why you are so obsessed with TG</I><BR/><BR/>I wish I could be flattered by or even able enjoy the emotional <I>frisson</I> that comes from being the target of some wacko's obsession, but NAMBLA-Richard Evans is singularly promiscuous when it comes to his stalking. He's got a whole harem of people in his sights. If I were the jealous type, I'd be miffed.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-78858200800537479432008-02-24T10:08:00.000-05:002008-02-24T10:08:00.000-05:00richard - again, I am not sure why you are so obse...richard - again, I am not sure why you are so obsessed with TG, but I am not going to be drawn into defending of something that exists only in your mind.<BR/><BR/>If you cannot see the difference between someone who consistently posts as TG, and someone who may one moment post as "biff", and another as "troll on a roll", then there is nothing I can do to help you with that.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-54511630458695165972008-02-24T09:16:00.000-05:002008-02-24T09:16:00.000-05:00Have you figured out how it is yet that thai-guy c...<I>Have you figured out how it is yet that thai-guy can bitch about anonymous commenters while being, himself, an anonymous commenter?</I><BR/><BR/>NAMBLA-Richard Evans has been asking this question for years now. It's been explained to him over and over again and he willfully refuses to accept the explanations he's given.<BR/><BR/>It's astonishing to think of the degree to which he's invested in presenting himself as completely unteachable.<BR/><BR/>Is it the chronic alcoholism? Is it an addiction that's even more dire? Is it brain damage? Is it child abuse? Is he being paid to harass? Is it his hatred of Eastern Canadians and various other <I>others</I>?<BR/><BR/>I personally believe Richard Evans should have been charged with online stalking and harassment long ago.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-33535898809802396402008-02-24T02:48:00.000-05:002008-02-24T02:48:00.000-05:00As for the anonymous thing, you know very well he ...<I>As for the anonymous thing, you know very well he and I are referring to sock puppets.</I><BR/><BR/>Got some links to back-up the sock-puppet claim? I'm waiting...<BR/><BR/><BR/><I><B>crickets chirping</B></I><BR/><BR/>C'mon gayle, put up or shut up...<BR/><BR/>Oh, I almost forgot... Have you figured out how it is yet that thai-guy can bitch about anonymous commenters while being, himself, an anonymous commenter?<BR/><BR/>mymymyyyy... Looks like you've got some work to do gayle... Don't want all these nice folks to see you as a lying hypocrite now do you?<BR/><BR/><I>Enjoy the squirrel.</I><BR/><BR/>It's somehow ironic that you'd mention "squirrel", thai-guy, because there's a rumor out there that you're hung like one...Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08833076599650152590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-20265193359013577962008-02-24T01:02:00.000-05:002008-02-24T01:02:00.000-05:00mikeI am referring to the 1990 decision of Taylor ...mike<BR/><BR/>I am referring to the 1990 decision of Taylor that held that this section was constitutional:<BR/><BR/>13. (1) It is a discriminatory practice for a person or a group of persons acting in concert to communicate telephonically or to cause to be so communicated, repeatedly, in whole or in part by means of the facilities of a telecommunication undertaking within the legislative authority of Parliament, any matter that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt by reason of the fact that that person or those persons are identifiable on the basis of a prohibited ground of discrimination.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-68953694253544903072008-02-23T22:15:00.000-05:002008-02-23T22:15:00.000-05:00I would be more interested if Chomsky was one of t...<I>I would be more interested if Chomsky was one of the SCC justices who upheld s. 13 of the HRA. But he isn't.</I><BR/><BR/>Except Section 13(1) has never been Supreme Court tested.<BR/><BR/>I suspect you are referring to a 1988 challenge, where the the SCC upheld a challenge to the H.R.A.<BR/><BR/>You might note that Section 13(1) was added after September 11th, in 2002, and therefore the 1988 decision is irrelevant. <BR/><BR/>A challenge to 13(1) would be on completely new territory as there is no real constitution case law behind it.Mike Brockhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00470275406733737128noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-92003596562217049172008-02-23T21:29:00.000-05:002008-02-23T21:29:00.000-05:00Sorry to tell you this, but I haven't read Chomsky...Sorry to tell you this, but I haven't read Chomsky, and I really could not care what he thinks about the HRC's. It does not change my opinion.<BR/><BR/>I would be more interested if Chomsky was one of the SCC justices who upheld s. 13 of the HRA. But he isn't.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-77695579923311651232008-02-23T21:21:00.000-05:002008-02-23T21:21:00.000-05:00What's Frances talking about? Chomsky's shrine?An...What's Frances talking about? Chomsky's <I>shrine?</I><BR/><BR/><I>Anyway I'd like to chat but I'm off to a dinner party so gotta go.</I><BR/><BR/>Enjoy the squirrel.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-58621662248778662072008-02-23T20:54:00.000-05:002008-02-23T20:54:00.000-05:00Gayle - I assumed that you were following the disc...Gayle - I assumed that you were following the discussion on this blog about the Levant etc. controversy since you were, I was going to say, pontificating on it at some length. Anyway the blogger at Dime a Dozen solicited that oracle of the left, Noam Chomsky on the very issue and he wasn't impressed with the fact that Levant and Steyn were being dragged before the H. R. Commission.<BR/><BR/>Most left-wingers worship at his shrine, and to be fair to Chomsky, he does justify his views as he indeed did in this case. Anyway BCL worships at his shrine and hasn't commented. Don't tell me you haven't read Chomsky/<BR/><BR/>Anyway I'd like to chat but I'm off to a dinner party so gotta go.<BR/><BR/>Ti-guy go watch the hockey game.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-32624950037830849102008-02-23T20:31:00.000-05:002008-02-23T20:31:00.000-05:00frances - why would I care what Chomsky thinks? Is...frances - why would I care what Chomsky thinks? Is he supposed to be my guru???<BR/><BR/>As for your lurking comment, not sure what you are getting at...Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-80993825468857449812008-02-23T19:37:00.000-05:002008-02-23T19:37:00.000-05:00Chomsky doesn't even sue the Reich-wingers who've ...Chomsky doesn't even sue the Reich-wingers who've libeled him.<BR/><BR/>Too bad your hero Ezra "The Censor" Levant can't be as principled and consistent.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-90977216055414575812008-02-23T19:30:00.000-05:002008-02-23T19:30:00.000-05:00Gayle, did you notice that Noam Chomsky disagreed ...Gayle, did you notice that Noam Chomsky disagreed with your take on the Levant/Steyn/HRC controversy. He believes in free speech and relies on U.S. jurisprudence. Surely you were lurking but not responding. Cat caught your tongue? <BR/><BR/>I guess you're smarter than your Guru now?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-92203080233923200422008-02-23T18:58:00.000-05:002008-02-23T18:58:00.000-05:00richard - my mistake. For some reason I keep confu...richard - my mistake. For some reason I keep confusing you with all the silly little anons.<BR/><BR/>Reading back over your posts I see you have been consistent in your insistence in ignoring the entire topic in order to direct some rather juvenile insults towards TG.<BR/><BR/>Your obsession with him is kind of weird, but who am I to criticize. As for the anonymous thing, you know very well he and I are referring to sock puppets. <BR/><BR/>BCL and TG - thanks for the kind words, particularly the hyperbole :). I do not allow the dante's of the world bother me.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-3927045066276945862008-02-23T18:02:00.000-05:002008-02-23T18:02:00.000-05:00I guess I will forget about pointing out your inco...<I>I guess I will forget about pointing out your inconsistencies...</I><BR/><BR/>You've failed to point out <I>any</I> sort of inconsistency on <I>my</I> part but, please, keep trying... While you're on the hunt, try to figure out how thai-guy can bitch about "anonymous" commenters when he, himself, is anonymous. When you get it solved, come back and tell the rest of the group.<BR/><BR/><I>And be civil to Gayle. She always is.</I><BR/><BR/>She may be civil but she doesn't seem too bright...Richardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08833076599650152590noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-81536634109972794052008-02-23T16:40:00.000-05:002008-02-23T16:40:00.000-05:00Hey, Dante....shut the fuck up. Your voyeurism is...Hey, Dante....shut the fuck up. Your <I>voyeurism</I> is adding a creepy quality to the lame war I'm having with NAMBLA-Dick and his stable of rent-boys.<BR/><BR/>And be civil to Gayle. She always is.Ti-Guyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06620550471437012866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-48491747435240530152008-02-23T16:38:00.000-05:002008-02-23T16:38:00.000-05:00Dante, don't diss Gayle. She is a very clever lad...Dante, don't diss Gayle. She is a very clever lady and has apparently read some law stuff. She is way too smart for this blog and that she ever chooses to post here is like having an angel fallen to Earth.bigcitylibhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05081538803991095825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-34336517502049560322008-02-23T16:34:00.001-05:002008-02-23T16:34:00.001-05:00Hey Gayle.Please shut the fk up. I'm enjoying the ...Hey Gayle.<BR/><BR/>Please shut the fk up. I'm enjoying the battle and your smug amateurish baiting is grating. Now get out of the way so I can see a real fight.Dantehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17467453055415173229noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-86243993199464737652008-02-23T16:34:00.000-05:002008-02-23T16:34:00.000-05:00Shouldn't there be an age limit on calling oneself...Shouldn't there be an age limit on calling oneself progressive?<BR/><BR/>If one's favourite musicians include Gram Parsons, Bob Dylan, The Stones, The Faces, etc., can one reasonably be considered progressive? <BR/><BR/>Your values are over 40 years old now, they've been implemented, most have them have failed...can't you just shut the hell up and garden?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-14430890989934197602008-02-23T16:12:00.000-05:002008-02-23T16:12:00.000-05:00Richard - clever argument. Calling me names proves...Richard - clever argument. Calling me names proves how very smart you are.<BR/><BR/>I guess I will forget about pointing out your inconsistencies and hypocrisies when you can silence me by calling me a stunned twat. I am humbled.<BR/><BR/>I guess the cons DON'T have any intelligent trolls. That must explain why they think this ad is actually going to succeed.Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08112657859825911939noreply@blogger.com