tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post3514364067850350416..comments2024-03-28T00:54:34.206-04:00Comments on BigCityLib Strikes Back: Battling Ontario's Anti-Wind NIMBYsbigcitylibhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05081538803991095825noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-78357035087242118372011-08-02T05:17:55.108-04:002011-08-02T05:17:55.108-04:00you can get dress pant in affordable price and fre...you can get <a href="http://www.mensusa.com/tools.aspx?id=125" rel="nofollow"><b>dress pant</b></a> in affordable price and free shipping $99 above.Mariahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15948115149015814935noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-60461208808805276492011-06-03T14:10:28.477-04:002011-06-03T14:10:28.477-04:00Sleep deprivation can be more than a health concer...Sleep deprivation can be more than a health concern. It can be a war crime. Emphasis on "can" as in, "in some circumstances." They want you to leap blithely over these qualifications and circumstances and then accept that wind turbines are health threats. They propound so the burden is on them to prove their claim by sound evidence. And, as we're talking a scientific matter, that means peer-reviewed research. They don't even come close to that. Their arguments aren't scientific but rhetorical, bordering on sophistry.The Mound of Soundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09023839743772372922noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-63119008717907023312011-06-03T14:02:55.357-04:002011-06-03T14:02:55.357-04:00They have shot back, though, in their reply, they ...They have shot back, though, in their reply, they claim they are <a href="http://windconcernsontario.wordpress.com/2011/06/02/environmental-defence-is-getting-desperate/#more-25677" rel="nofollow"> Self-funded </a>. <br /><br />This line of argument they have repeated again: <br /><i>Environmental Defence, the CMOH survey and an earlier survey by the Canadian Wind Energy Association acknowledge annoyance but do not consider it an adverse health effect; the World Health Organization considers both annoyance and sleep deprivation to be adverse health effects. In turn and over time, annoyance and sleep deprivation lead to other adverse health effects.</i><br /><br />Is it true people are really suffering from adverse health effects and are living away their homes? They seem to claim that a lot.jkghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11896248753234065744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-30955230198090563532011-06-03T11:59:40.061-04:002011-06-03T11:59:40.061-04:00But that's what NIMBYism's about.
Anyway,...But that's what NIMBYism's about.<br /><br />Anyway, what I'd like to know is if they're really grassroots or if they've hooked up with some anti-wind-industry funding (or some combo thereof).bigcitylibhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05081538803991095825noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23292180.post-10532295947048376332011-06-03T11:49:35.974-04:002011-06-03T11:49:35.974-04:00I have long wondered about LaForet's agenda. ...I have long wondered about LaForet's agenda. He seems to have latched onto this after a couple of failed attempts at muni politics.<br /><br />WindConcernsOntario seems to me to be almost cult-like in nature. They uncritically embrace anything that seems to support their premise, even stuff that's inconsistent or contradictory with other claims. They don't even try to respond to contrary evidence or obvious criticism of their claims.The Mound of Soundhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09023839743772372922noreply@blogger.com