Pages

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Half Mast And Upside Down

Fun Flag Facts

If the Tories choose to ignore Andrew Telegdi's motion to half-mast the Canadian flag on the Peace Tower whenever a Canadian soldier is killed in Afghanistan or on some other overseas assignment, what happens?

The government could accept it. Or it could simply ignore it. The latter would raise an interesting jurisdictional issue. The Peace Tower is part of the Parliament Buildings. Who controls those buildings, including the flagpole? Who decides whether the Commons may take a moment to honour a fallen soldier? Is it the government of the day? Or is Parliament? I'd vote for Parliament.

Worst Headline Ever: Lowering the flag for soldiers dilutes its importance.

Lead Tory talking point (repeated in CanWest Newspapers all across the country):

The government has studied practices from previous wars, such as the Second World War. Had it been lowered for each death in that war, they note, it would have remained there for most of the war, creating both logistical and morale problems.

Well, what exactly would be wrong with flying the flag permanently at half-mast during times of war? Arguing that it would create morale problems or is defeatist misinterprets the gesture. Among other things, the half-mast flag is a symbol of national mourning and, if the nation is in the midst of a particularly grievous War, where soldiers are dying every day, then by definition it is a nation in a constant state of mourning. I don't see anything bizarre about using the flag on the PT to express that fact. I even see the poetics of it as being rather compelling.

What happened last time this issue came up (in April of 2006):

More (53%) Disagree Than Agree (45%) With Decision To Not Fly Flag At Half-Mast Every Time A Soldier Is Killed
Picture from here, by the way.

4 comments:

  1. ''Well, what exactly would be wrong with flying the flag permanently at half-mast during times of war?''

    Who and how is it decided if a war is over?
    We would have to keep the flag at half mast as long as there was the 'potential' of a Canadian soldier getting killed, that would include as 'peace keepers'.

    Would our flag ever fly hig again?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Still drunk, eh Wilsie? Or is it the pills?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Mr. Wilson... I think we'd know a war is over when our leader (usually an arch-conservative) stands on the deck of an aircraft carrier and declares, "Mission Accomplished".

    http://www.larrytt.com/cartoons/mission_accomplished_final.jpg

    LOL...

    On a more serious note, I would say you have a good point about "undeclared wars"... BUT - the point of this blog is that you would raise the flag only when a soldier dies. This is (thank God) not even a weekly thing in Afghanistan. A more serious war - ala WWII - and we'll have a lot more to worry about than flag position, in this day and age of nuclear and chemical weapons and quick global striking capability...

    ReplyDelete