Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Donald Trump. Show all posts
Tuesday, January 31, 2017
O Glorious Justin: This Is A Thing Cleverly Done
So you diss Fox News over their reporting re the mosque shootings in Quebec. Cdn media reports on that. Then U.S. outlets have to report on it too. Then Fox News has to respond. And THEN you know The Donald has read it. And maybe he responds, or not. But its a neat way of delivering your broader message to the one person you really want to reach. Smooth, like the Brits do. And its the same way his staff signal disagreement with his policies. They leak to Fox.
Tuesday, November 15, 2016
Small Mercies? Is Trump Softening Stance On Climate Change/Paris Agreement?
There are signs. Climate change denier Myron Ebell may not get top spot at the EPA:
Myron Ebell, a prominent climate change skeptic who runs the Competitive Enterprise Institute libertarian think tank, has been leading Trump's EPA transition team, but sources said he is not likely to become the administrator.
Furthermore, the bottom couple of paragraphs from a recent article in Utility Dive, quoting a "Trump Insider", suggest that Trump may have advanced a bit beyond crude climate change denial. He won't lead an attack on renewables, and further:
There will be “enormous casualties among climate change activities,” the Trump insider said. But, he added, “Trump doesn’t want to turn his back on climate change.”
...which sounds bad, but better than claiming its all a Chinese hoax. Interestingly enough, the first version of piece is quite a bit more hard-line:
Trump's back-tracked on a few issues over the past couple of days. Maybe this is what we are seeing here. On this one it makes sense for him to retreat towards something like the G.W. Bush position. That is, accept the underlying science and remain onside with the Paris Climate Agreement in theory (I am hearing stories that his opposition to that may not be set in stone), but in practice do nothing. Why choose active belligerence when inaction is enough? Which is bad news, but not as bad as if he were to actively attempt to kneecap the renewables sector.
Myron Ebell, a prominent climate change skeptic who runs the Competitive Enterprise Institute libertarian think tank, has been leading Trump's EPA transition team, but sources said he is not likely to become the administrator.
Furthermore, the bottom couple of paragraphs from a recent article in Utility Dive, quoting a "Trump Insider", suggest that Trump may have advanced a bit beyond crude climate change denial. He won't lead an attack on renewables, and further:
There will be “enormous casualties among climate change activities,” the Trump insider said. But, he added, “Trump doesn’t want to turn his back on climate change.”
...which sounds bad, but better than claiming its all a Chinese hoax. Interestingly enough, the first version of piece is quite a bit more hard-line:
Trump's back-tracked on a few issues over the past couple of days. Maybe this is what we are seeing here. On this one it makes sense for him to retreat towards something like the G.W. Bush position. That is, accept the underlying science and remain onside with the Paris Climate Agreement in theory (I am hearing stories that his opposition to that may not be set in stone), but in practice do nothing. Why choose active belligerence when inaction is enough? Which is bad news, but not as bad as if he were to actively attempt to kneecap the renewables sector.
Thursday, July 14, 2016
Tim Tebow Says He Ain't Speaking At RNC National Convention
There is a list, and he's on it. But then there's his Facebook message saying its all a rumor. But that's a semi-official looking list. Did the Trump gang stick Tebow on it without telling? And if Tebow shouldn't have been there, how many other entries are false?
Tuesday, January 12, 2016
O'Leary For CPoC Leader?
@Bigcitylib2 ding ding.— Rosemary Barton (@RosieBarton) January 13, 2016
It actually makes sense if you think about it. The rest of the field sure ain't making anyone's heart beat any faster. This may be the year of the crass rich guy, with strange/no hair. And the funny thing is: it would make Rob Ford the most influential politician of the young millennium. Guys like Trump and (maybe eventual Prime Minister) O'Leary have surely studied him to see how far the limits could be stretched. Rob Ford took the Overton Window and fucking ate it raw. It's his world now; we just rent from him.
Wednesday, December 23, 2015
The Funniest Thing I Ever Said On The Internet
Apparently, according to the likes and re-tweets I got:
— Bigcitylib (@Bigcitylib2) December 23, 2015It was supposed to be ironic, but even totally non-ironic Trump fans seem to dig it, for presumably the wrong reasons.
Thursday, November 19, 2015
No, Donald Trump Didn't Say Muslims Should Be Issued Special Badges.
What he said is he wouldn't rule out giving them some form of special identification that noted their religion. This could be a badge, but it might also be a chip-card, or an arm-band, or maybe a tattoo. Get it right, Liberal Media Party.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
