People don't even DO Phil. of Sci. that way any more. Anyway, I eventually found my copy of Braithwaite. It did not prove particularly enlightening.
Although I did have a cool signature line:
The Shapes of Things are Dumb. – L. Wittgenstein
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Did I Really Say That?
Apparently, back before the turn of the century (based on the old email address), I did. Its been so long I'm not really sure that I would understand the correct answer to my question if someone told it to me today.
People don't even DO Phil. of Sci. that way any more. Anyway, I eventually found my copy of Braithwaite. It did not prove particularly enlightening.
Although I did have a cool signature line:
The Shapes of Things are Dumb. – L. Wittgenstein
People don't even DO Phil. of Sci. that way any more. Anyway, I eventually found my copy of Braithwaite. It did not prove particularly enlightening.
Although I did have a cool signature line:
The Shapes of Things are Dumb. – L. Wittgenstein
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I see you've been spelling "original" origonal for quite some time. Do you set your spell check to ignore that? ;)
Why should I be the one that changes?
Sorry for any obscurity in my own presentation here.
You're forgiven. :)
I always thought the word "origonal" was a mash-up of "original" and "orthogonal," but I inevitably stop there, experience satori, and move on to your next sentence.
I thought you meant "related to orgon".
Post a Comment