Friday, January 21, 2011

*Cough* Busted? *Cough* *Cough*

The link in the tweet goes to this cell-phone (?) pic. Looks to me like its been shot from the driver's side.

8 comments:

Alison said...

In Tony Clements defense (am I really saying that?) it is likely that his car is not moving. At least I'm sure that is how he justified the tweet & pic. It would, however, be sort of fun to see him fined under his own law.

bigcitylib said...

I'm sure the car is not moving. Note the brake lights. I'll bet (but I haven't checked) that the law doesn't really have a loophole for that.

double nickel said...

Steve "I make the rules" Harper will have this covered, no doubt.

Southern Quebec said...

Doesn't he have a chauffeur?

bigcitylib said...

My bad. If Tony was not in motion than he's off the hook.

ridenrain said...

MY GOD! This is even bigger that the communion wafer story! I'd bet the CBC could mine this one for weeks.

yawn....

When does Liberal MP Pablo Rodriguez's drunk driving trial come up?

bigcitylib said...

Dunno. Maybe he and Tony can go before the judge together. Don't know if either should be driving, though.

scottk said...

I think the law says something about the car being stopped in safe manor. I know being stopped at a stop sign or stop light doesn't count. I'll bet being stuck in traffic doesn't count either.