@tyler_bryant @StephenLeahy Right. Climate value of "trading" pipeline for GHG reduction elsewhere will depend on the numbers...which is to say that a deal is doable, if whatever Keystone XL produces by way of carbon emissions can be offset elsewhere. To embed Mr. Donner again:
— Simon Donner (@simondonner) September 6, 2013
@StephenLeahy Not ideal, but not impossible. Lots of other GHG reduction opportunities in Canada which could be offered.We shall see. But I should say I doubt this government's ability to whomp up a real CO2 reduction plan in the time available, especially if it needs buy-in from the provinces. For example, to save the tar sands does Ontario's auto industry get thumped?
— Simon Donner (@simondonner) September 6, 2013
But, once again, doable...as in not impossible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b7c5/1b7c59f831370d8fd6ec1e8862f3a14a5cea4b80" alt=""
1 comment:
colour me skeptical too, Harper and Oliver arent really committed to reducing GHGs.
Do we even have an environment minister anymore or did resource manager oliver become that title too:P
Post a Comment