CTS Dinged By CBSC

...for gay bashing, natch:

The CBSC has acknowledged in previous decisions that program participants are entitled to discuss the issue of sexual orientation from a Christian perspective and to declare homosexuality a sin. ¹   At the same time, however, comments that reach the level of abusive or unduly discriminatory material are prohibited under the Human Rights clauses of the CAB Code of Ethics and Equitable Portrayal Code.  Examples of content that was found to violate these Codes in previous decisions include the following: allegations of an insidious gay agenda whereby homosexuals “recruit”, “indoctrinate” or “brainwash” children; ² characterizations of homosexuals as “sick”, “demented”, “dysfunctional”, “deviant”; ³ references to homosexuals being “devils”; ⁴ a comment about killing homosexuals; ⁵ allegations that homosexuals are responsible for the spread of disease and that they have an “insatiable appetite” for sex with children. ⁶

Hiding their hate behind their holy book.  

Probably another day of not much blogging.  Someone call me when there's some real news.  Clint Eastwood don't cut it.

On Why Gays Are Freakin' Everywhere!

The war is over, and to celebrate here's a paper from the CHRC website--"Human Rights Commissions and Public Policy: The Role of the Canadian Human Rights Commission in Advancing Sexual Orientation Equality Rights in Canada". More than a little self-congratulatory, but filled with interesting historical information. For example, I had no idea the RCMP objected to including sexual orientation as a prohibited ground of discrimination in the original CHRA because they were concerned "that homosexual public servants were susceptible to blackmail and therefore posed a threat to national security". Now, we're talking 1977, and perhaps back then this might have seemed a rational objection. Else why would an organization of homosexual alcoholics seek to deny rights to homosexuals in general? (Remember, one of the Village People is a cop).

Ronald McDonald: Smilingly Underwriting Homosexual Insurrection?

Actual title from The LifeSite: Ronald McDonald Cozies Up To Homosexual Movement, which is also pretty good, although I like my graphic--R. McDonald with doodle exposed(see left)--way better.

As for old Ronald, I have always figured he was, sexual orientationwise, a bit tippy. For one thing, he is in far better physical condition than is possible for a straight male.

And then there's the name, too: "Ronald". Growing up, what chance did the kid have?