DonS writes in comments:
Mark Steyn, embroiled in a lawsuit brought by Dr. Mike Mann, is asking for suggestions as to how he can substantiate his case during the discovery phase of the trial. Plainly, Steyn wants the Climate Skeptic blogosphere to provide lines of inquiry which will support certain statements he made about Dr. Mann for which the suit was brought.
Actually, its advisable to "substantiate" your statements before you accuse somebody of scientific misconduct. As one of Tony's readers notes: Steyn is admitting that he accused Mann of fraud although he did not have evidence to backup his claim. But whatever. I'd recommend Steyn take a look at the journal "Pattern Recognition in Physics". Go for it, Mark me lad! It's been peer-reviewed.
No comments:
Post a Comment