Tips on Beating Down the Conservative Menace
The innocence of the mascot changes nothing. It's still corrupt.
What the CBC is sucking then is too profane to mention even on this blog.
"The innocence of the mascot changes nothing. It's still corrupt."and ridofbrain is a moron and the sky is blue. Thank you for the socratic dialogue Ridofbrain.
"What the CBC is sucking then is too profane to mention even on this blog."No but you suck and that is perfectly fine to mention on any blog.
I'll keep the tone of debate to something the regulars can understand: I know you are but what am I?
Suck on this Gene.CBC receives a subsidy 1000 times larger than Macleans does. Let's be equitable and remove the subsidy from both organizations.
Nah Paul then you'd find something else to bitch about. Ridofbrain, rubber to your glue. You really should start wearing a helmet on that bike.
plus Paul S what should I suck on? Your inability to stay on topic?Changing the goalposts again to suit your own argument.
Not me doing the complaining Gene.Subsidies are the topic at hand. Question is why is the elephant in the room on the issue of subsidies (the CBC) consistently ignored?
yeah for Macleans. You're just not wanting to discuss that because your talking points got jammed in your fax machine. No CPC talking points -> change goalposts.
Post a Comment
10 comments:
The innocence of the mascot changes nothing. It's still corrupt.
What the CBC is sucking then is too profane to mention even on this blog.
"The innocence of the mascot changes nothing. It's still corrupt."
and ridofbrain is a moron and the sky is blue. Thank you for the socratic dialogue Ridofbrain.
"What the CBC is sucking then is too profane to mention even on this blog."
No but you suck and that is perfectly fine to mention on any blog.
I'll keep the tone of debate to something the regulars can understand: I know you are but what am I?
Suck on this Gene.
CBC receives a subsidy 1000 times larger than Macleans does. Let's be equitable and remove the subsidy from both organizations.
Nah Paul then you'd find something else to bitch about.
Ridofbrain, rubber to your glue. You really should start wearing a helmet on that bike.
plus Paul S what should I suck on? Your inability to stay on topic?
Changing the goalposts again to suit your own argument.
Not me doing the complaining Gene.
Subsidies are the topic at hand. Question is why is the elephant in the room on the issue of subsidies (the CBC) consistently ignored?
yeah for Macleans. You're just not wanting to discuss that because your talking points got jammed in your fax machine.
No CPC talking points -> change goalposts.
Post a Comment