In 2005, the liberal government in Ontario passed legislation called the “Places to Grow Act” to align its land use/planning codes and government policies to United Nations Agenda 21.
[...]
In a nutshell, [Agenda 21] calls for government to eventually take control of all land use removing decision making from the hands of private property owners. It is assumed people are not good stewards of their land and “the government” will do a better job if it is in total control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body.
[...]
U.N. Agenda 21 proponents cite the affluence of North Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. The document calls for a redistribution of wealth, lowering the standard of living for Canadians so that maybe the people in poorer countries will have more. Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, North Americans are cast in a very negative light for our energy consumption. Agenda 21 aims to reduce Canadians to a condition closer to average in the world. Only then, say the promoters of Agenda 21, will there be their social justice which is the so-called cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan.
On her website she's taking a poll asking if opposing Agenda 21 should be made a CPC election issue. Be sure to vote yes.
6 comments:
Being anti-environment and anti-social justice in one policy statement. It doesn't get better than that.
The government already controls land use. We only really "rent" it. For example, the government can give mining rights to anyone they want on your land without your approval. Just ask First Nations peoples.
The UN and its Canadian lackies are getting stomped at present.
This is the stupidest thing I think I've heard yet, not counting the Republicans who spout the same conspiratorial bull. Do none of her staffers/handlers think to maybe proof-read what goes out?
It's interesting how she slides back and forth between "Canadians" and "North Americans" without any direct mention of the Southern Beast. Plus apparently no one clued her that the ICLEI mothership is located in Berkeley, as that would have been sure to generate yet more foam.
She still has one marble. She can trade it for sovereign citizenship.
Post a Comment