We had some friends over Sat night. After a few sips, the discussion got to be about your previous blog.
The girls all said - when they see Harper sex never comes to mind. One girlfriend said it would be too much work - PM approved instructions, moan and groan control, have to wear blue lingerie with a little "C" logo somewhere (tatoo perhaps). cover your body with Timbits, and if you didn't play his way you'd be tossed out.
The comment about the 2 gentlemen with Harper left me with a bad tsate in my mouth. I know you menat it to be humerous but were these men not Indian or dressed in ethnic garb I wonder if uit would have led to a comment?
Unless, of course, it is Islam in which case he is scared s**tless.
And where's your blog, oh brave one?
Never fails. A Muslim does something and we get at least a month's worth of right wing imbeciles pulling on it, right in front of us, right in the open.
I think Sue930 may have been a tich thin-skinned but the question was not unreasonable even if she was wrong. The nice thing about not being a rightwing neanderthal is that we arent afraid to ask questions.
Paulie Precious goes to all the trouble of creating tiny url's and then just pastes them into the comment, making it too much work for anyone to bother following the links.
Not once, in the years he's trolled here, has he ever responded to either a comment that shows him up to be fool or responded to a request to substantiate one of his claims.
Gayle, the previous thread went to 50 posts. Was that not enough?
Since the issue is settled (at least for our lifetimes) and because a proper, detailed response would entail hundreds of words, I left my response as is.
I take it back. No Majority for you, dorky boy.
27 comments:
Is that naan in is pocket? Or is he just happy to be there?
We had some friends over Sat night. After a few sips, the discussion got to be about your previous blog.
The girls all said - when they see Harper sex never comes to mind. One girlfriend said it would be too much work - PM approved instructions, moan and groan control, have to wear blue lingerie with a little "C" logo somewhere (tatoo perhaps). cover your body with Timbits, and if you didn't play his way you'd be tossed out.
Silly time after a few.
The comment about the 2 gentlemen with Harper left me with a bad tsate in my mouth. I know you menat it to be humerous but were these men not Indian or dressed in ethnic garb I wonder if uit would have led to a comment?
I didnt view the comment as a slight on Indian men or older men. That's a bit too much conjecture for me sue930.
Sue930: That type of language policing and scanning for bigotry/offense is what has given liberals/lefties a bad name.
These ad hominums are boring.
Slow news day, Harry.
...ad hominums...
It's not even an ad hominem.
"3 randomly selected individuals currently ahead of Michael Ignatieff in the polls"
Oh Meta you are so funny I forgot to laugh. Those conservatives and their "humour"
Quick name me three conservative comedians who are known more for being funny than angry?
actually name me three conservatives.
No ad hominums, Gene!
BCL likes to make fun of religions. Unless, of course, it is Islam in which case he is scared s**tless.
Ah Frank D, the crotchety old man of commenting threads, never pausing within his hypocrisy to throw a stone.
Unless, of course, it is Islam in which case he is scared s**tless.
And where's your blog, oh brave one?
Never fails. A Muslim does something and we get at least a month's worth of right wing imbeciles pulling on it, right in front of us, right in the open.
I think Sue930 may have been a tich thin-skinned but the question was not unreasonable even if she was wrong. The nice thing about not being a rightwing neanderthal is that we arent afraid to ask questions.
Power makes a leader sexy no matter what the situation. Don't believe me?
http://tinyurl.com/y9nkrm6
http://tinyurl.com/yd7bhz9
http://tinyurl.com/ycpwcpy
Now why would I want to put the effort of cutting and pasting into your shilling Paul S?
We can all see your Harper hardon & it's kinda weird looking. You should see a doctor about that.
Ti-Guy is already the main purveyor of assholery here Gene; develop your own schtick instead of aping his.
http://tinyurl.com/ymqgsb
Paulie Precious goes to all the trouble of creating tiny url's and then just pastes them into the comment, making it too much work for anyone to bother following the links.
Learn to code a link in html, PP.
Happy now?
Shorter Paul S: Waaahh! You caught me wanking!
Hi Paul.
I am still waiting for an answer to my question on the previous thread.
Surely someone who thinks he knows as much as you apparently do would be able to handle the question.
Paul S' specialty is handling himself not questions.
Not once, in the years he's trolled here, has he ever responded to either a comment that shows him up to be fool or responded to a request to substantiate one of his claims.
He's a practised liar.
Gayle, the previous thread went to 50 posts. Was that not enough?
Since the issue is settled (at least for our lifetimes) and because a proper, detailed response would entail hundreds of words, I left my response as is.
In other words - you have no idea what the OCA did wrong, and you cannot back up your claim the constitutional argument was not inevitable.
Just as I thought.
Don't make excuses for him, Gayle. That he had no idea what the OCA did wrong is beside the point and likely matters not one bit to him.
He doesn't come here to share his informed opinions to benefit of others. That's not what practised liars do.
He's just here to derail discussion.
Post a Comment