...because he's got that supermodel-on-the-cat-walk "I know you want me, I don't want you" look in his eyes. If he's going to go around looking like this (though frankly he could still afford to lose a few lbs--is that his gut or is he smuggling fertilizer?) I don't know what the point of voting Lib could possibly be. We got nothing policy-wise. If we lose our edge in sexxxiness we're truly fucked.
Can we get a nude shot of Gerard Kennedy here, or Pablo Rodriguez, or at least Ruby Dhalla? I'm losing faith.
26 comments:
Not sexy at all BUT sure makes him look the part of "Great Leader".
And as the complete title would go:
"Great Leader Stephen Meow Tongue"
too funny. word verication for this comment is: sopsicat
If he tussles that hair, I'm sold.
If he tussles that hair, I'm sold.
Something needs to be done with it. He's got a bit of case of Lego hair right now.
I wonder how many tax paid photographers he brought along to get that shot.
At least there is some good news from APEC: next month's Copenhagen scam has collapsed before it's begun:
"Asia-Pacific leaders have agreed to abandon any concrete goals for next month’s Copenhagen summit on climate change, settling instead for broad statements of principle, Stephen Harper confirmed Sunday.
At the conclusion of the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation forum, the Prime Minister said that December’s meeting would not generate any specific targets among nations for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.
“There are obviously significant areas of disagreement,” he told reporters at the conclusion of the summit. - G&M
The world is safe from the eco-jihadis and Prophets for profit, at least for a while longer.
Now the thousands of freeloading delegates can concentrate on getting drunk and smoking dope for eleven days.
It gets better. They seem to have dropped previously hoped for CO2 targets and are looking for ways to improve global growth!
"But the group (APEC)dropped a target to halve greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, which was outlined in an earlier draft.
Leaders also vowed to pursue a new strategy for growth after the world's worst economic crisis in decades."- BBC
Someone get Frank D some tissues before he messes up the place!
Maybe we should all give up and just start talking dirty to them.
I'm surprised Canadian nonsense hasn't tossed in some more garbage.
Has anyone calculated the carbon footprint of the thousands of warmer delegates who will be jetting to Copenhagen for a now meaningless exercise (which could just as easily be done over email)?
Will those delegates declare their purchases of carbon offset credits from companies in which Al Gore and Mo Strong have a financial interest?
This should be made mandatory at each of these interminable warmer fests.
Has anyone calculated the greenhouse gasses admitted by FrankD`s boring endless tirades?
The carbon footprint of FrankD is only eclipsed by his stupidity footprint. You can see that one from space.
"Now the thousands of freeloading delegates can concentrate on getting drunk and smoking dope for eleven days."
Yeah maybe if they were going to Amsterdam genius, but Copenhagen is quite different. Hasnt been like that in Freetown Christiania for years. But I wouldnt expect you to know that FrankD. Worldly you are not.
Okay back to your continued wanking. You should get together with Canadiansense for some synchronized mental masturbation.
"The arrogance of the warmers on this board is surpassed only by the arrogance of the UN itself:"
or
The idiocy of Frank D on this board is surpassed only by the idiocy of the Blogging Tories themselves.
Board? It's a comment thread but I wouldnt ask Frank D for any internets advice... he's still looking for the tubes.
Here is a little something to help you folks educate yourselves:
Nine minute excerpt from Lord Moncton's talk to the Cambridge Union.
Warning! This video has images of hot university babes sitting in the audience.
Isnt Lord Monckton as credible as Gurmant Grewal?
A leading climate scientist accused the Indian environment ministry of “arrogance” after the release of a government report claiming that there is no evidence climate change has caused “abnormal” shrinking of Himalayan glaciers.
Someone who's read the report notes that:
-it's all about galciers, no information on climate. "In order to detect a climate change signal, you'd need to combine the glaciology data with climate data and most likely models capable of simulating the evolution of the climate with and without human influence."
-the report notes that the glaciers in the Himalayas have been shrinking for over 100 years.
"The report presents no definition of "alarming / abnormal" (say, in terms of % change) nor does it present data or any analysis to test the notion that the retreat is or is not alarming / abnormal. All we're really left with is that glaciers are retreating and the retreat may or may not be caused by climate change."
Another blog notes that there were surveys of the glaciers not included in the report. Also "that ‘recent years’ implies 2007-2009 – a period of time that is clearly far too short to come to such sweeping conclusions, particularly on climate-related studies."
There's nothing more arrogant on God's green Earth than a "Conservative."
Dunning-Kruger, don't you know.
Frank D's existance verifies Dunning-Kruger. Man's not qualified to operate a spoon on a good day.
"Conservatives" all remind me of that episode of The Simpson's when Homer attends a class in applied nuclear technology at university:
"Uh, excuse me, Professor Brainiac, but I worked in a nuclear power plant for ten years, and, uh, I think I know how a proton accelerator works."
You warmers are losers. You can't attack the message so you attack the messenger, including spiking his posts.
Your 15 minutes is up. Your apocalyptic pronouncements have run out their string. Like here:
But Al Gore said it would happen?
Experts say fears surrounding climate change are overblown:
Alarming predictions that climate change will lead to the extinction of hundreds of species may be exaggerated, according to Oxford scientists.
They say that many biodiversity forecasts have not taken into account the complexities of the landscape and frequently underestimate the ability of plants and animals to adapt to changes in their environment.“The evidence of climate change-driven extinctions have really been overplayed,” said Professor Kathy Willis, a long-term ecologist at the University of Oxford and lead author of the article.
Okay, so animals will migrate to better climate to survive. Will we allow people the same freedom when their land becomes inhabitable because of climate change?
And isn't there something contradictory in claiming there's no such thing as climate change (and theory derived from science), and then sighting a study that notes what might happen in the future under climate change?
And isn't there something contradictory in claiming there's no such thing as climate change (and theory derived from science), and then sighting a study that notes what might happen in the future under climate change?
Totally consistent on the part of the wingies. They believe this...
1. Global warming doesn't exist.
2. It exists, but it's not anthropogenic.
3. It's anthropogenic but there's nothing we can do about.
4. We can do something about it, but it'll be too expensive.
5. It won't be too expensive, but it's too late anyhow.
6. It's not too late, but geo-engineering is now required.
...all at the exact same time.
My God! Nostalgia!
Post a Comment