...you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. Similarly, if you urge the wider consumption of Kangaroo meat as a means of fighting climate change, your reception is likely to be on the tepid side, even in Australia where they actually do consume the stuff.
Not that I doubt the basic argument re reducing beef consumption as a means of reducing C02 emissions, but Greenpeace Australia would have done better to put it in general terms, rather than suggesting that folks turn around and eat Skippy.
Talk like that gets you on an appearance on the front page of Drudge and causes the term "moonbat" to get thrown around rather wantonly.
1 comment:
Speaking of Mao, converting to communism would certainly reduce emissions. 100 million or do gov't-approved murders to start, plus the complete shut down of almost all industries. Who would complain about being sent to a gulag TO SAVE THE PLANET?
Post a Comment