How Much Does Bourque Charge To Keep Your Story Out Of The Headlines?
Notice anything? No mention of yesterday's disastrous Tory press conference at all. First time in ages Bourque has done anything more than cop the from page of National NewsWatch.
Since we're talking about the Ad scandal, the fact that Bourque does this and doesn't declare it on the site is a violation of the act at election time.
Like in 2006 ... When he ran headlines for the Tories but didn't tell anyone so most reporters and people on the net assumed it was "news" not "ads"
So, yeah, he could be caught in this mess when the raid is looked through because each paid headline SHOULD have said "authorized by the registered agent for the ...". Otherwise we don't know if it is an ad or not, and if so who paid for it.
If he were independent, one would think he'd jump at the chance to hype the biggest story of the week in Canadian politics. And it was hard to trump the raid too. Doesn't he like writing "Adscam" on his page?
4 comments:
Can't we just put that loser on welfare, or something?
It just makes him look incompetent.
Since we're talking about the Ad scandal, the fact that Bourque does this and doesn't declare it on the site is a violation of the act at election time.
Like in 2006 ... When he ran headlines for the Tories but didn't tell anyone so most reporters and people on the net assumed it was "news" not "ads"
So, yeah, he could be caught in this mess when the raid is looked through because each paid headline SHOULD have said "authorized by the registered agent for the ...". Otherwise we don't know if it is an ad or not, and if so who paid for it.
Outside of the writ it is unethical at best.
If he were independent, one would think he'd jump at the chance to hype the biggest story of the week in Canadian politics. And it was hard to trump the raid too. Doesn't he like writing "Adscam" on his page?
Post a Comment