But perhaps "atomically dorky" might do it. More dorky photos here, including this one 
...of Mark Steyn lying about the size of his schlong.PS. I swear Steyn shaves with the Miami Device.
But perhaps "atomically dorky" might do it. More dorky photos here, including this one ...of Mark Steyn lying about the size of his schlong.
33 comments:
There you go again, indulging your passion for cryptozoology
Is Ezra wearing make-up? Dear gawd that's creepy...
" Mike said...
Is Ezra wearing make-up? Dear gawd that's creepy..."
Lol...I had EXACTLY the same thought, Mike.
Oh & BCL? Steyn was referring to the size of your brain - NOT what you said. Stop being so bashful. ;)
I've said it before...Levant bears an uncanny resemblance to that puppet thing from Saw. Or Wayland Flowers's Madame.
*tsk* What am I saying? What hideous puppet does Levant not resemble?
Steyn, looking unshowered, as usual.
There wasn't one face in that entire photo-op that I recognised that didn't make me wretch, with the exception of Pamela Wallin. Ezra Levant, Mark Steyn, Rona Ambrose, Sandra Buckler, Peter Kent, John Baird, Tony Clement, Diane Findlay, Maxime Bernier....
Where's a suicide bomber when you really need one?
Ti-guy,
he uses the "miami device". See link in main post.
he uses the "miami device". See link in main post.It's more the sheen on his skin that makes me think he's taking a rather cavalier attitude to personal hygiene these days. Although the homage he's paying to islamist sartorial tradition for men doesn't help either.
Shave that bum-fluff off your face, go on a diet and shut the fuck up you hideous, Conrad Black-fellating ponce.
"I'm so happy to have lived long enough to experience the type of high school I thought only existed in the imaginations of traumatised American television producers."
Lol...good description!
I wasn't laughing at the makeup.
The tacky comb-over of his rapidly balding head...
That gave me the giggles.
Can't wait till he's bald.
Levant isn't wearing any makeup. That's just the way he looks.
He's ugly. Even he knows that.
MJ Murphy- thanks for the insightful and witty thread.
It's all starting to make sense.
Until now, I was unaware of your attempts to prevent Steyn from exposing the (somewhat permissive) bestiality laws in Iran.
But the reality is, no matter how much you try to "strike back" against Steyn and Levant etc, the HRC's are unlikely to become so malleable and sympathetic as to be convinced of your human right to sodomise sheep (even if you were to observe the post- coital non-consumption rule), as they're clearly a major source of exports here- http://www.sheepbreeders.ca/genetics.html
(although the term "sheep breeders association" is ambiguous, I agree.)
Steyn is rather cruel. He links to your stuff and people read it and contrast his and Levant's accomplishments and influence with yours. You look pretty sad by comparison.
Accomplishments? Hey, at least I finished highschool.
Ah, I see BCL is still penning razor sharp commentary, and his three lapdog readers are still here demonstrating the latest in contemporary "Liberal" "analysis": finding labels for one's opponents and publicly peeing on them.
Ti-Guy says every face in the photo-op (except Wallin) made him wretch. Yep, I got it Ti ... hate thine enemies, and anyone of any stripe who would support them in any way, even when they happen to be right?
Just tell me this Ti ... what exactly is it about Liberal MP Keith Martin (one of the sponsors of the event) and Liberal Senator Jerry Grafstein (the first speaker) that makes you want to bring up your lunch? Got no stomach for Liberals who show support for true liberal values?
The only thing I find nausea-inducing here is your ultrapartisan, uninformed, context-free infantile prattle. Nothing personal.
No point actually dealing with issues or attempting to employ facts -- which would require actually knowing something about them. Last time BCL tried this he ended up collateral roadkill in Steyn's decidedly proctological evisceration of "Doctor" John Miller in the now famous Sheep-Shagging Affair.
No wonder the pantsing you guys received while ago for vacuous schoolchild snot-fare over trivialities surrounding last month's freedom fest in London didn't put you off the game. After the epic disembowelment Steyn handed out there it's obvious why BCL avoids dealing with any issue weightier than a dustbunny and no longer pretends to use actual factuals.
Steyn knows his readers appreciate a good laugh so he linked up again to your latest exercise in schlong-envy, BCL. Better put on a pot of tea.
As Steyn says, Oriana Fallaci actually interviewed the Ayatollah, which is quite impressive "primary source" material. As far as MJ Murphy's involvement, I think it’s totally bizarre that anyone would so fervently try to refute the Ayatollah’s animal-bonking rules, which were reprinted year-in-year-out in the BLUE Book for all to see.
The sock puppets tried a different angle on live TV- makes for hilarious viewing. Sadly, they don't quite make it through the sheep-shagging quote from the Ayatollah's blue book (only the endorsement of sex with 9 year old girls- with provisos), but to see a group of educated Muslims indignantly admitting that they find Ayatollah Khomeini's teachings OBJECTIONABLE and OFFENSIVE (in the context of Steyn's writings, that is) is guaranteed to amuse.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wa2T0nBBfWY&NR=1
(These law students just look so incredibly lame and inarticulate coming up against Steyn. Watch all 5 parts and have a good laugh.)
PS. I think MJ Murphy “owes Steyn an apology”. But I would like to thank him (MJ Murphy, that is) for provoking Steyn into bringing to the attention of his many thousands of readers the very offensive details of the Ayatollah's Blue Book.
“Hissy, pissy, bitchy little Steyniacs. You all sound like 13-year old girls.”
Funny that- I thought exactly the same about you, and was going to suggest you stop "sucking up" to MJ Murphy.
Let's be reasonable and objective here:
1. You've made no comments other than derogatory ones about the above photos of Steyn and Levant.
2. Several people have responded by alluding to the now-famous sheep-shagging incident, where MJ Murphy questioned the existence and authenticity of the Ayatollah’s animal-sex rules. Steyn showed very convincingly that MJ Murphy was WRONG.
3. You, YT Guy, have responded not by attempting to debate this issue, but by calling people "Hissy, pissy, bitchy little Steyniacs."
Is that the best rebuttal you can muster??
A 13 year old girl could do much better, I would think
Pipe down Julie and drink in an examination of what Taint Stain wrote in 2001:
What's the theory? The Muslims/the Jews (delete according to prejudice) were warned to stay away from the World Trade Center on 9/11. There are two mirror-image theories here. One is that many American Muslims knew of the attack in advance. This has been propgated by the journalist Mark Steyn, writing in the Daily Telegraph in November 2001. A Muslim student at a Brooklyn high school, he claims, said to his teacher on 6 September 2001: "See those two buildings? They won't be standing there next week."
On 10 September 2001, he continues, a sixth-grade student of Middle Eastern origin at a Jersey City school warned his teacher to stay away from Lower Manhattan because "something bad was going to happen". Teachers at schools within sight of the World Trade Center in New York reported that, as the towers burned, many Muslim students were taking pictures: it seemed odd that so many of them happened to have brought their cameras to school on that particular day.
I love the Internet. The unlettered ponce will never be able to run away from all the crap he's written over the years.
The lunatic should have been institutionalised years ago.
By the way, Julie...
You, YT Guy, have responded not by attempting to debate this issue, but by calling people "Hissy, pissy, bitchy little Steyniacs."Since when am I obligated engage in an argument I don't care about, and which is, in relation to all the shit Steyn has shat over the years, an incident of rather minor import?
I'm not as stupid as you Steyniacs. Could you all please get that through your granite heads?
Thenk yew.
"Since when am I obligated engage in an argument I don't care about, and which is, in relation to all the shit Steyn has shat over the years, an incident of rather minor import?".
I think you're being selective Ti-Guy...you think this piece of "shit" is of minor import and refuse to engage in an argument because you know Steyn is correct.
Let’s say I agree with you- that in the scheme of things this argument is of minor import.
The people who did NOT agree with you, that is to say, thought it was of MAJOR importance were:
1. MJ Murphy aka BigCityLib (the author of this blog, right here)
2. Dr Miller aka The Journalism Doctor
3. The "Law Is Cool"/ sock puppet crowd
These people put an awful lot of time and energy into "engaging in an argument" with Steyn. They (not Steyn) turned the sheep-bonking into a major issue.....launching an HRC complaint against Steyn...."debating" him on national TV....endlessly blogging about it etc.
All these people clearly DID care about and engage in argument over the existence of and/or Steyn’s right to quote the Ayatollah's sheep-shagging lessons, and other aspects of the Macleans article.
So your buddies, including BCL, thought it was an incident of rather major import. According to you, that makes them "as stupid as Steyniacs".
Now "pipe down" Ti-Guy. Watch the TVO sock puppet debate for a laugh- and don't take yourself so seriously!
Ti-Guy...you think this piece of "shit" is of minor import and refuse to engage in an argument because you know Steyn is correct.
How do these people manage to type while tongue-washing Steyn's brown eye all at the same time?
Read what I wrote again: it's of minor significance compared to all the shit Steyn has shat over the years (for example, what I referenced above). Even a granite-headed Steyniac can figure that out, I should think.
Here's a recent indictment from Glenn Greenwald, in which he basically calls Steyn a fraud:
"The faux defense of Western liberties from the anti-Muslim, Mark Steyn Right."
Read the whole thing. He flays the bitchy little ponce and a couple of his other butt-buddies for good measure.
I was making the point that BigCityLib (and others listed) thought the incident was a really, huge deal of enormous import.
And my second point, which you've nicely illustrated, is that if someone dismisses an argument as being of no import (despite the fact that his buddies have gone blue-in-the-face arguing about it), it raises the question of WHY they say... “since when am I obligated engage in an argument I don't care about.”
In your case, you want the Ayatollah's Blue Book/ sheep-shagging regulations to just go away, because BCL and company lost the argument against Steyn. In fact, they lost big-time. No tongue-washing involved.
Just a simple matter of winner and loser(s).
That is all.
PS. Noteworthy that BCL himself has made no comment here about the sheep-bonking. What I would like to see is him come out and say that it’s “of no import”. I won’t hold my breath though. I think he knows where that would lead. Best to just pretend it never happened.
It was of no import.
Of no import, you say, Big City Lib?
http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2008/11/steyn-gets-punked-by-28-year-old.html
But of just enough import for you to email Steyn himself to say:
"I think you owe Dr. Miller an apology", and then alter your post.
PS. And Ti-Guy, you should desist with "tongue-washing BCL's brown eye" all the time. It's most unbecoming. (Well, not "unbecoming" to him, to be sure.)
And Ti-Guy, you should desist with "tongue-washing BCL's brown eye" all the time.
Too late. I accused you of reaming first. Come up with something better.
*tsk* What am I saying? If these people could recognise imaginative writing, they wouldn't be reading old Pit Stain.
Still waiting for a response from BCL....
Is it just me, or does any one else get the feeling that BCL and Ti-Guy and one and the same?
Which makes this an impressive display of intellectual masturbation, albeit a misnomer as far as the intellect goes.
I've yet to be convinced of that. Certainly, the moral imbecility of Steyniacs is manifestly evident.
Tiguy and I are not the same person, as far as I know.
That thing with the sheep is a long time ago now, and anyway the sheep is dead.
BCL, as much as you would like to wish it away or wish it dead or whatever, the sheep thing is still very much alive.
Your understandable humiliation at being proven wrong, and so publicly, by "Mad Mark" is still very evident 6 months on. And for as long as this blog exists, people will mock you for it.
And for as long as this blog exists, people will mock you for it...
...he intoned, pompously.
Get a life Steyniac. Did you follow the link I provided to Greenwald's exploration of the ponce's moral depravity? The World has been mocking that for years and it's getting worse with every new crayon-scribbling from the smelly, faux-Canadian wingnut.
"Get a life Steyniac."
....he intoned, pompously.
And for that matter, who are you to lecture others about "morals". What a hoot!
Actually, no matter how much the likes of BCL "strike back", they will have to accept that Steyn has enjoyed enormous success and a massive following. When are you releasing your best-seller, Ti-Guy?
Pipe down and get some anger-management therapy.
When are you releasing your best-seller, Ti-Guy?
When Regnery doles the wingnut welfare to have me write one. I'm going to title it "Tossed Off Toff : Mark Steyn's Years in an English Boarding School."
"Accomplishments? Hey, at least I finished highschool."Wow!!! What a towering spiritual giant in comparison to such uneducated (formally, that is) nitwits as Mark Twain, Thomas A. Edison, the Orville brothers, ...
Edit:
Wright brothers (Orville and Wilbur), of course ...
Post a Comment