Neo-Con Vs. Theo-Con: Incipient Split In Canadian Conservative Movement?

A few days ago, Richard Dawkins spoke at The Fraser Institute, and the folks at Lifesite are not happy:

Social conservatives are being increasingly squelched and alienated by the power ascendant fiscal conservatives who see them as an albatross to strategic power alliances with elements of Canada's socially liberal establishment. Despite this, as Dennis Gruending wrote in a November 2007 article, the Fraser Institute apparently receives most of its funding from social conservatives.

To which I can only say to folks like Deborah and co.. Yes! Its true that you're being squelched! The fiscal Conservatives are getting all those regressive tax cuts, and all you have to show for it is that lousy fake abortion bill! Its time to withdraw from the political arena altogether, or at least switch your vote from the CPoC to these guys! Its the only way to maintain your principles!

PS. When using comments on other blogger blogs, I notice a third method of commenting not available on mine, where you can enter a name/url as here. How do I rig comments to get that option working?

Another Neo-Con Washes His Hands Of It All

In August I wrote a short post entitled "Conservatives Pre-Spin Iraq Defeat", in which I argued that U.S. Conservatives (in particular the N.Y. Post's Ralph Peters) were getting set to throw in the towel on Iraq and, when they did, they would blame the Iraqis themselves for the whole catastrophe. Well, about six months later Charles (the Kraut Hammer) Krauthammer has, as if on cue, emerged and denied all responsibility for the disaster, on behalf of himself, his Conservative ideology, and his Conservative President. He writes:

America comes and liberates them from the tyrant who kept everyone living in fear, and the ancient animosities and more recent resentments begin to play themselves out to deadly effect. Tens of thousands of Iraqis have died, the overwhelming majority of them killed by Sunni insurgents, Baathist dead-enders and their al Qaeda allies who carry on the Saddamist pogroms.

[...]

Iraqis were given their freedom and yet many have chosen civil war. Among all these religious prejudices, ancient wounds, social resentments, and tribal antagonisms, who gets the blame for the rivers of blood? You can always count on some to find the blame in America.

[...]

...Iraq is their country. We midwifed their freedom. They chose civil war.

And you know what? I'm just going to repeat what I said in August:

This excuse has been brewing among the American Right since 2004, when the insurgency first took a solid hold. But they've been holding it in reserve until recently when things really started to go South on them.

Specifically, the excuse runs as follows: The U.S. invasion was actually a gift to the Iraqi people, and all those bombs were the sound of Freedom coming. If the Iraqis had just behaved like a conquered people should behave, they too could have had a Starbucks on every corner. But they've fucked it up. Hence, when the last American soldier gets hauled off out of the Green Zone by helicopter, shit flying out of the bottom of his pant-leg, the mess he leaves behind will not be the fault of the good old U.S. of A.

Expect to hear more of this argument in the coming weeks and months. Expect a recurrence maybe two years down the road in Afghanistan, mouthed by whatever Canadian politicians are in power at the time.

h/t to Boswarlos Daily.