But its OK; the witch hunt can be extended easily enough!
Showing posts with label Islamists In Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamists In Canada. Show all posts
Monday, October 04, 2010
Lilley Lists Imam Delic's Unsavory Friends
...fails to mention the mysterious "Hugh Segal". He also fails to mention McCarthy Tetrault, Philips and Vineberg, and others on this list of Islamic History Month Board of Advisers who claim to be lawyers. But of course, if they were Islamist sympathizers, they would, wouldn't they?
But its OK; the witch hunt can be extended easily enough!
But its OK; the witch hunt can be extended easily enough!
Thursday, November 19, 2009
Will B'nai Brith ReFeed Teh Crazy?
Well, they say they're going to.
Canadians welcome anti-radical Islam ad, B’nai Brith vows more to come
One hopes this is just butt-covering bluster designed to facilitate a retreat from this travesty of demagoguery and sub-standard graphic design. If BB does decide to run further inflammatory adverts, one can only hope they make them less like the kind of thing a teenage punk-band might produce with glue-sticks, scissors, and a cheap photocopier.
Talk to them about that, Harry Abrams.
Canadians welcome anti-radical Islam ad, B’nai Brith vows more to come
One hopes this is just butt-covering bluster designed to facilitate a retreat from this travesty of demagoguery and sub-standard graphic design. If BB does decide to run further inflammatory adverts, one can only hope they make them less like the kind of thing a teenage punk-band might produce with glue-sticks, scissors, and a cheap photocopier.
Talk to them about that, Harry Abrams.
Sunday, November 09, 2008
Tarek Fatah's Name Disappears From Silly Article
Yesterday, an article appeared on the website of The American Thinker entitled "The Islamist Role in the 2008 Canadian Elections", and authored, apparently, by "Raheel Raza and Tarek Fatah". By yesterday afternoon, however, Fatah's name had disappeared from the article's header, leaving Ms. Raza sole responsibility for the piece. By evening, his name had also been pulled from the version of the article present on the Islamist Watch site. Furthermore, Mr. Fatah showed up in the comments section of this blog, essentially disowning the piece, and wondering how I might have come to "associate" it with him.
Interesting, too, I think, in that Raza and Fatah are shown as co-authors of a number of articles previously published, for example here and here.
Well, I have changed the attribution in the original post but, in answer to Mr. Fatah's question, as noted above (and as you can see from the screen capture below), the original attribution was based on the fact that Mr. Fatah was originally given as co-author.
Interesting, too, I think, in that Raza and Fatah are shown as co-authors of a number of articles previously published, for example here and here. What the real story behind the cock-up is I have no idea, but I would note that "The Islamist Role...":
1) suggests a "Taliban-style overthrow" of North America is "unlikely, in the short term". Good news, that.
2) suggests that Rahim Jaffer lost out among Muslim voters because he was not ugly enough.
I wouldn't want my name attached to such a piece of crap either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)