Monday, February 04, 2008

It's Official! Hitler's Brain Endorses Liberal Private Member's Motion!!!

From the deep dark jungles of Brazil, the disembodied brain of Hitler speaks out on M-446, Liberal MP Keith Martin's private member's motion to gut Canadian Civil Rights Legislation.

"Cheeze Und Kkkrackers! Dis motion Vill Be Und "Get Out Of Jail Vrrree Card" vor my leetle Canadian Nazi Bruzzers! Keith Martin izz my kind er leetle "brown guy"!" Take me to Kkkanada, zzen, vere dey are zzzoft und vee Nazzis!
Background is here und here.

15 comments:

Ti-Guy said...

That's the worst Hitler impression I've ever read. It's so bad, I'm hauling you before the human rights commission.

Unknown said...

If Warren can sue Blazing Cat Fur with a Nazi inference can Keith Martin sue BCL?

Ti-Guy said...

If Warren can sue Blazing Cat Fur with a Nazi inference can Keith Martin sue BCL?

Anyone can sue anyone for anything, Wayne.

Reality Bites said...

You can all laugh, but this is a very important development.

This is indication there's a brain on that side.

Red Tory said...

Not exactly helping your cause here, BCL.

Just as an aside... how to do a funny Hitler, err, Hilter accent:

I am not a racialist, but, und this is a big but, we in the National Bocialist Party believe das Überleben muss gestammen sein mit der schneaky Armstrong-Jones. Historische Taunton ist Volkermeinig von Meinhead. Und Bridgwater ist die letzte Fühlung das wir haben in Somerset!

bigcitylib said...

Rather think it does RT. Repealing Section 13 will quite literally make it easier for Canadian Nazis/White Nationalists to organize/recruit etc. Wish your side would at least acknowledge that before you try steering the arguments towards a debate over empty philosophical concepts.

rabbit said...

Freedom is a scary thing.

When citizens have broad freedoms, they are going to do and say a lot things that many people, and those in government in particular, are going to disapprove of.

Freedom does not guarantee blissful co-operation and coherence. Quite the opposite - it's a guarantee of acrimony and strife between individuals and groups.

But that's a price that must be paid. The alternative is a government that treats its citizens like children, incapable of deciding on their own of what they should do and what they should say.

bigcitylib said...

RT,

Read rabbit and think of what I said re empty philosophical concepts.

rabbit said...

BCL:

You should really be arguing for revoking the right against arbitrary detention and imprisonment. Then we can just throw all those neo-Nazis in jail. That would stop 'em from organizing and recruiting.

Myself, I think restricting our most fundamental freedom just cause there's a few impotent wankers chanting Zig Heil! in their mother's basement while dressed up in Halloween costumes is a ridiculous over-reaction.

See? No more philosphy.

Ti-Guy said...

You should really be arguing for revoking the right against arbitrary detention and imprisonment. Then we can just throw all those neo-Nazis in jail. That would stop 'em from organizing and recruiting.

The counter-arguments really don't get any better than this, do they?

Myself, I think restricting our most fundamental freedom just cause there's a few impotent wankers chanting Zig Heil! in their mother's basement while dressed up in Halloween costumes is a ridiculous over-reaction.

Freedom of expression is not the the most fundamental freedom. Freedom of thought and conscience is.

Gayle said...

"Myself, I think restricting our most fundamental freedom just cause there's a few impotent wankers chanting Zig Heil! in their mother's basement while dressed up in Halloween costumes is a ridiculous over-reaction."

Of course that is not what is happening, but don't let the truth stand in the way of your noble fight.

The Charter allows ALL rights and freedoms to be restricted. You need to go and read the SCC decision in Taylor and maybe you will understand what that is.

Unknown said...

"The Charter allows ALL rights and freedoms to be restricted. You need to go and read the SCC decision in Taylor and maybe you will understand what that is."

You are correct Gayle. That is why we are not as free as we think we are.

"It is a perversion of terms to say that a charter gives rights. It operates by a contrary effect - that of taking rights away."
- Thomas Paine

Gayle said...

I know a lot of people who have benefitted from sections 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 15 who would beg to differ with you and Mr. Paine.

It might help if you brought some examples or facts to back up that notion.

James said...

You're incredible, BCL. Are you worried that if these Canadian "Nazis", all 13 of them, are able to disseminate their childish rants on cobbled-together websites, you might find yourself on one of those sites? You might be won over by some of their powerful arguments, and suddenly you're goose-stepping down the street calling for death camps!

No. You're too smart for that, aren't you? It's all those other, stupider people that will be "recruited". You're an elitist, and it's for you to decide what everyone else should hear. Please, BCL, guide me. I can't think for myself. I'm so hung up on "empty philosophical concepts" like human rights that I can't see the way forward to social harmony the way you can.

Anonymous said...

Soft on Nazis? Thank Trudeau, one of their earliest sympathizers.