Tips on Beating Down the Conservative Menace
She seems unclear of reality here:Ruth said the reaction of her colleagues earlier Tuesday speaks to a recognition that something must be done."The amount of laughter you heard in committee, I'm not the only one who has this problem with swimmer's itch."I think that some of her collegues may have been laughing at her... Just a guess...But she does prove that all politics are local and most just care about themselves...
Holy fuck, what an idiot. Yeah, and let's feed the pigeons to the poor as well.We are ruled by retards.
Just to get past the retard comments for a moment, many Canadians eat Canada geese, enjoy them and thrive on them.
As have I, Tom, a long time ago. It was from a wild area and, hopefully, hadn't been ingesting lawn chemicals.
many Canadians eat Canada geese, enjoy them and thrive on them.You can eat a lot of things if you have to. That doesn't make Nancy Ruth's suggestion any less stupid.Most people in this society would find fowl that hasn't been bred for human consumption unpalatable, even if they can't taste the toxins these urban geese are no doubt filled with.
I say we feed Ruth to Tom - they deserve each other....Maybe next Queen Ruth will suggest that the poor can be used as manual labour to shift garbage in dumps to find food and nutrient there.
Maybe Senator Ruth just wants to fatten up the poor so they'll be properly well-marbled when the time comes...
Ruth, however, is one Conservative we can't blame Harper for. She was appointed to the Senate by Paul Martin as a Progressive Conservative (despite the party no longer existing at that point) and only joined the Conservative party in March 2006.(Of course I'm probably being presumptious to assume any of you would have thought someone connected to Harper would ever suggest feeding the poor anyway. He considers poverty a "slimming opportunity")
Ruth, however, is one Conservative we can't blame Harper for.Sure we can. Harper's emboldened mean-spirited and ignorant sots everywhere.
Nancy Ruth is a lesbian feminist and among the reddest of Red Tories. I'm not excusing what she said - it was stupid at best - but she is not cut from the same mean-spirited cloth as the Harpies.
I didn't know that.The Harpies sure aren't our parents' Conservatives, are they?
As a friend said, let Lemmy guide us, Eat the Richhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45WnW0ASFY
ummmmm... You dweebes do know that geese are migratory don't you? They fly around. Alot.
Richard Evans: NAMBLA researcher and now expert on branta canadensis.
No thai-guy, I'm no expert but I do know that "city geese" and "country geese" are the same damned goose. Last week, the bird you're seeing in Toronto, was on a wilderness pond in rural PA. Next week that same goose be on a secluded lake in northern Ontario.The goose "shot in an urban setting" was in that urban setting for a very short relative time and it's wholely unlikely that the "urban setting" has had an adverse effect in it's value in terms of consumption.That BigCityLiar included the whole "urban setting" aspect was nothing more than scare mongering.Maybe you twats should spend some more time in the rural setting before you comment further on such issues...
Post a Comment