Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Why Not Feed Them To The Rich?

Because, Senator Ruth, the flesh off a goose shot in an urban setting is potentially contaminated by, among other things, lead and golf course herbicides, and a fit meal for neither rich nor poor.

Silly woman.

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

She seems unclear of reality here:
Ruth said the reaction of her colleagues earlier Tuesday speaks to a recognition that something must be done.

"The amount of laughter you heard in committee, I'm not the only one who has this problem with swimmer's itch."


I think that some of her collegues may have been laughing at her... Just a guess...


But she does prove that all politics are local and most just care about themselves...

Ti-Guy said...

Holy fuck, what an idiot. Yeah, and let's feed the pigeons to the poor as well.

We are ruled by retards.

Tom said...

Just to get past the retard comments for a moment, many Canadians eat Canada geese, enjoy them and thrive on them.

bigcitylib said...

As have I, Tom, a long time ago. It was from a wild area and, hopefully, hadn't been ingesting lawn chemicals.

Ti-Guy said...

many Canadians eat Canada geese, enjoy them and thrive on them.

You can eat a lot of things if you have to. That doesn't make Nancy Ruth's suggestion any less stupid.

Most people in this society would find fowl that hasn't been bred for human consumption unpalatable, even if they can't taste the toxins these urban geese are no doubt filled with.

Anonymous said...

I say we feed Ruth to Tom - they deserve each other....


Maybe next Queen Ruth will suggest that the poor can be used as manual labour to shift garbage in dumps to find food and nutrient there.

Ti-Guy said...

Maybe Senator Ruth just wants to fatten up the poor so they'll be properly well-marbled when the time comes...

Reality Bites said...

Ruth, however, is one Conservative we can't blame Harper for. She was appointed to the Senate by Paul Martin as a Progressive Conservative (despite the party no longer existing at that point) and only joined the Conservative party in March 2006.

(Of course I'm probably being presumptious to assume any of you would have thought someone connected to Harper would ever suggest feeding the poor anyway. He considers poverty a "slimming opportunity")

Ti-Guy said...

Ruth, however, is one Conservative we can't blame Harper for.

Sure we can. Harper's emboldened mean-spirited and ignorant sots everywhere.

Reality Bites said...

Nancy Ruth is a lesbian feminist and among the reddest of Red Tories. I'm not excusing what she said - it was stupid at best - but she is not cut from the same mean-spirited cloth as the Harpies.

Ti-Guy said...

I didn't know that.

The Harpies sure aren't our parents' Conservatives, are they?

Scanner said...

As a friend said, let Lemmy guide us, Eat the Rich
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h45WnW0ASFY

Richard said...

ummmmm... You dweebes do know that geese are migratory don't you? They fly around. Alot.

Ti-Guy said...

Richard Evans: NAMBLA researcher and now expert on branta canadensis.

Richard said...

No thai-guy, I'm no expert but I do know that "city geese" and "country geese" are the same damned goose. Last week, the bird you're seeing in Toronto, was on a wilderness pond in rural PA. Next week that same goose be on a secluded lake in northern Ontario.

The goose "shot in an urban setting" was in that urban setting for a very short relative time and it's wholely unlikely that the "urban setting" has had an adverse effect in it's value in terms of consumption.

That BigCityLiar included the whole "urban setting" aspect was nothing more than scare mongering.

Maybe you twats should spend some more time in the rural setting before you comment further on such issues...