On Music
[Teenagers] are very reluctant to pay for [music] (most never having bought a CD) and a large majority (8/10) downloading it illegally from file sharing sites. Legal ways to get free music that teenagers use are to listen to the radio, watch music TV channels (not very popular, as these usually play music at certain times, which is not always when teenagers are watching) and use music streaming websites (as I entioned previously).
[...]
A number of people use the music service iTunes (usually in conjunction with iPods) to acquire their music (legally) but again this is unpopular with many teenagers because of the ‘high price’ (79p per song). Some teenagers use a combination of sources to obtain music, because sometimes the sound quality is better on streaming sites but they cannot use these sites whilst offline, so they would download a song then listen to it on music streaming sites (separate from the file).
On Social Networking & Twitter
Most teenagers are heavily active on a combination of social networking sites. Facebook is the most common, with nearly everyone with an internet connection registered and visiting >4 times a week. Facebook is popular as one can interact with friends on a wide scale. On the other hand, teenagers do not use twitter. Most have signed up to the service, but then just leave it as they release that they are not going to update it (mostly because texting twitter uses up credit, and they would rather text friends with that credit). In addition, they realise that no one is viewing their profile, so their ‘tweets’ are pointless.
Newspapers
No teenager that I know of regularly reads a newspaper, as most do not have the time and cannot be bothered to read pages and pages of text while they could watch the news summarised on the internet or on TV.
The only newspapers that are read are tabloids and freesheets (Metro, London Lite…) mainly because of cost
Cinema
... it is possible to buy a pirated DVD of the film at the time of release, and these cost much less than a cinema ticket so teenagers often choose this instead of going to the cinema.
Mobile Phones
As most teenagers’ phones have Bluetooth support, and Bluetooth is free, they utilise this feature often. It is used to send songs and videos (even though it is illegal) and is another way teenagers gain songs for free.
On HD TV
However, many are not utilising this HD functionality, as HD channels are expensive extras which many families cannot justify the added expenditure. Many of them don’t want to sign up to HD broadcasting services, as adverts are shown on standard definition broadcasts, so they can’t see the difference.
Note here, and in the original report, how often the word "free" comes up. And, frankly, with respect to movies, tunes, and TVs, I can see little difference between teen and adult behavior. Nobody I know (mostly 30 to 50-ish) has bought music in years.
4 comments:
A little sophomoric don't you think?
99% of teenagers have a mobile phone and most are quite capable phones. The general view is that Sony Ericsson phones are superior,
With analysis like that (yes I realise it's a 15 year old), wonder how Morgan Stanley is doing?
I can see little difference between teen and adult behavior. Nobody I know (mostly 30 to 50-ish) has bought music in years.
Except that iTunes sales are okay.
Maybe looking at real figures would be more illuminating instead of these impressions.
With analysis like that (yes I realise it's a 15 year old), wonder how Morgan Stanley is doing?
Don't be so impertinent! The unscientific, anecdotal analyses of teenage Morgan-Stanley interns and their friends are not to be questioned by little people such as yourself.
BCL I think the difference is that people 30 and up have never been heavy music buyers but teens have traditionally been the major buyers.
Post a Comment